Constitution Warrior

Furthering the Cause of Anti-Federalism

Archive for the tag “VA”

Chief of Staff Dorn VA Medical Center Jan 2012 – Do Not “…send out anymore non-VA care GI requests for endoscopy until further notice.”

According to VA IG Report No. 12-04631-313 “Healthcare Inspection: Gastroenterology Consult Delays William Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center Columbia, South Carolina”, Former Chief of Staff Barbara Temeck, M.D, sent an email to the Business Office “not to “…send out anymore non-VA care GI requests for endoscopy until further notice.”” According to the IG Report the email stated ““…attempting to internalize as many of these 700 cases as possible.”. During January 1–March 29, 2012 only 100 Veterans were seen outside the VA for Colonoscopies while the In-house Colonoscopies declined during the same time period.

VA DORN No Fee BAsed care

Why the Chief of Staff made this decision is unclear.  The IG Report report substantiated claims of a lack of priority by HR and Nursing Admin to staff open positions in the GI Clinic.

We substantiated that GI staffing was not optimal and that critical nursing positions went unfilled for months. It was difficult to determine specifically when some critical positions were vacant, primarily because interviewees recalled dates and events differently or documentation was sparse. However, most GI managers and clinicians we interviewed relayed similar accounts of staffing deficiencies, positions not being backfilled, and difficulty getting approval for new hires. During the AIB, the former CoS testified that the GI Service lacked nurses and clerks, and that the problem was “fairly long standing.”

The Chief of Medicine requested funds in 2011 from VISN 7 to address the growing backlog in the GI CLinic. The Request was approved and the facility received $1.02M but only appropriated  $275,000 for Non-VA Care Colonoscopies.

We substantiated that VISN 7 gave the facility $1.02M in early September 2011 to use to address the GI backlog but that only approximately $275,000 was actually used for this purpose through August 2012. The Business Office was not aware that the additional monies were “earmarked” to address the GI backlog and obligated the funds as usual. The VISN 7 CFO told us that although the facility was given $1.02M expressly to address the GI backlog, they did not have to report back to the VISN on how the funds were used. The CFO reported that facilities may use their discretion to determine how to best meet the needs of their patients; however, fee care was specifically identified as a mechanism to reduce the backlog.

Clearly the funds were available to refer Veterans to Non-VA Facilities but the CoS chose not to. Why would the CoS make this decision when clearly the Facility did not have the capacity due to staffing issues. Veterans DIED. People need to be held accountable.

The REAL #VAScandal: Failure To Refer Veterans to NON-VA Facility For Care

 The VA is allowed by law to authorize Non-VA Facility Care.

Title 38 of the United States Code (USC) §1703 establishes clinical access
criteria and individual eligibility criteria for non-emergency fee care. VHA
must ensure that both criteria are met before authorizing inpatient care.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1703

Clinical Access Criteria—The statute authorizes the use of fee care only if
VHA: (1) does not have the clinical capability, (2) does not have capacity, or
(3) facilities are geographically inaccessible for the veteran.

The VA even has a Website about Non-VA Care

http://www.nonvacare.va.gov/

2010 Portland VA Medical Center Allegations of Unauthorized Wait Lists

On August 17th, 2010. The VA Office of the Inspector General issued a report based upon the following:

Senior Officials in VISN 20 Instructed Employees To
Use Unauthorized Wait Lists To Hide Access and
Scheduling Problems.

On March 1, 2010, the OIG received the following anonymous allegation:
Employees at the Portland VA Medical Center are being
instructed by VISN 20 Network Director and Deputy Network
Director to use paper wait lists to hide the access problems.
Eye Clinic alone has over 3,500 patients waiting more than
30 days.

But the report clearly states

OIG has reported problems since 2005 with
schedulers not following established
procedures for making or recording medical
appointments. This practice has resulted in
data integrity weaknesses that impacted the
reliability of patient waiting times and
facility waiting lists.

The Portland VA Medical Center and VISN 20 informed the OIG that they use Electronic Wait Lists.

Report Concluded They Could Not Substantiate the Claim.

Read Report HERE

Post Navigation